Welcome to Employment and Job Law Guide
Employment Law Articles Article
. For a permanent link to this article, or to bookmark it for further reading, click here.
You may also listen to this article by using the following controls.
Ohio Employment Law – Making it Right
from:Ohio employment law seems to be a bit of a mare's nest in terms of having definitive parameters. For instance, voters approved an amendment to the constitution to increase the minimum wage to $6.85 per hour. Also, under the amendment, Ohio employment law deems that employers set up and maintain detailed payroll records for each employee.
This Ohio employment law requirement did not go over very well with the business community, who felt the law was way overboard and a major pain in the butt. Politicians stepped in and fixed it. Or rather made Ohio employment law even vaguer by narrowing some of the amendments. This will most certainly result in constitutional challenges.
One of the tricky areas in Ohio employment law is the definition of who an employee is for the Ohio Wage and Hour Law. Now, you'd think that might be a no brainer, but there are workers under the age of 16. Basically, all employees in the state are to be paid the new minimum wage – with exemptions being those under 16, employees who are tipped and family members working in a family business (makes you think twice about working for your family doesn’t it?)
The bill brought in by the politicians narrowed the definition of an employee even further and excluded some of the following people from the minimum wage requirements: outside sales people, live-in companions, newspaper delivery persons, camp counselors etc. Bottom line is it messed things up even further for Ohio employment law.
A few other changes were also brought in. Under Ohio employment law employers MUST give all new employees their name, address, phone number, web address, email, and fax – among other things. Rather like overkill isn't it? People need to get this information on their first day of work. And, if the company moves, all the workers must be told within 60 days of any and all changes. They can tell them in a variety of ways such as stuffing a pay envelope or posting on a bulletin board.
Strict payroll records must be kept in a conspicuous place for workers to access, and to be able to do so at no charge. Tricky area here is Ohio employment law doesn't limit the request to see these records to just the record of the worker. Theoretically they could ask for anybodies records, even the boss.
The good news in this area of employment law is that the bill the politicians dragged into inception does narrow the amount of information that can be requested and who may request it.
Employment Law Articles News
Former NLRB Member Craig Becker Named AFL-CIO Co-GC - Law.com
 Law.com | Former NLRB Member Craig Becker Named AFL-CIO Co-GC Law.com The new co-GC is a former embattled member of the National Labor Relations Board and currently is a visiting professor at Georgetown University Law Center. Becker said no decisions have been made yet on how he and Rhinehart will divide up their duties. Former NLRB recess appointee takes job with AFL-CIO |
Employee-Friendly Pregnancy Rules Could Get Even More So - Corporate Counsel
 Corporate Counsel | Employee-Friendly Pregnancy Rules Could Get Even More So Corporate Counsel By Amanda BronstadContactAll Articles California's Department of Fair Employment and Housing has been holding hearings regarding legal requirements that employers accommodate employees who are pregnant or suffer medical conditions following childbirth. |
Suit says Placer County deputy's military employment rights violated - Sacramento Bee
Suit says Placer County deputy's military employment rights violated Sacramento Bee By Ed Fletcher Attorneys representing the Placer County Deputy Sheriffs' Association have filed a lawsuit in federal court alleging the county violated military employment rights. The suit alleges that following an 18-month tour of duty, ... |
More Protection for Georgia Franchisors - NuWire Investor
More Protection for Georgia Franchisors NuWire Investor For more on this continue reading the following article from Blue MauMau. As Coverall gets hit this month with a $3 million bill from a Massachusetts court for misclassifying its employees as franchisees, Georgia law can now boast, not in our state ... |
Leading article: We need to look beyond the fuss about Beecroft - The Independent
 The Guardian | Leading article: We need to look beyond the fuss about Beecroft The Independent Mr Beecroft had been asked to review employment law, with a view to cutting red tape. His proposal for a no-fault form of dismissal was a response to employers' complaints that current labour legislation makes it too expensive, in time and money, ... Vince Cable and the Beecroft affair |
NFLPA contends Article 3 of new CBA doesn't apply to collusion case - NBCSports.com
 NBCSports.com | NFLPA contends Article 3 of new CBA doesn't apply to collusion case NBCSports.com ... or television rights fees with respect to any League Year prior to 2011 , collusion with respect to any League Year prior to 2011 , or any claim that could have been asserted in White or Brady related to any other term or condition of employment ... |