Employment Job Discrimination Information Guide

Pa Employment Discrimination State Enforcement Agency Section


 

Pa Employment Discrimination State Enforcement AgencyNavigation


|

Employment Network Plus Home Page
Partners
Tell A Friend about us
Gender Employment Discrimination |
Employment Discrimination Cases |
The Age Discrimination In Employment Act Of 1967 |
Employment Discrimination |
California Employment Discrimination Law For Employee |
Employment Discrimination Laws |
Employment Discrimination Laws |
Employment Discrimination Laws |
Employment Discrimination Laws |
Employment Discrimination Laws |
Landmark Cases On Racial Discrimination In Employment |
Employment Discrimination Law Part 2 |
What Is Employment Discrimination |
Landmark Cases On Racial Discrimination In Employment |
Employment Discrimination Attorney |

List of employment discrimination Articles

Pa Employment Discrimination State Enforcement Agency Best seller

Buy it Now!



Sitemap



Social bookmarking
You like it? Share it!
socialize it

Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter AND receive our exclusive Special Report on employment discrimination
Email:
First Name:



Main Pa Employment Discrimination State Enforcement Agency sponsors


 

 

Welcome to Employment Job Discrimination Information Guide

 

Pa Employment Discrimination State Enforcement Agency Article

Thumbnail example. For a permanent link to this article, or to bookmark it for further reading, click here.


You may also listen to this article by using the following controls.

Employment Discrimination Cases That Have Helped Shape Today’s Laws

from:


Employment discrimination is an issue that touches many Americans. The landmark Civil Rights Act of 1964 did away with segregation and ensured working rights for African Americans and included the famous Title VII which prohibits employers to discriminate based on race, sex, religion or national origin. Since that time, a number of employment discrimination cases have made their way to the Supreme Court and have effectively changed how employment discrimination law is practiced today. In this article, we’ll take a look at a few of the employment discrimination cases that were judged by the Supreme Court and have shaped the law as we know it today.

The first of the employment discrimination cases of note, Griggs v. Duke Power Company, dates from 1971 and was an important victory for African Americans. The Court decided that it is unlawful to expect that certain educational requirements be met or to administer intelligence tests that are not related to the job to be filled. In many cases, these requirements or intelligence tests were an underhanded way to exclude African Americans from being considered for employment.

The next of the important employment discrimination cases was an important victory for pregnant teachers – 1974’s Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleur. At that time, public school boards had what would be considered archaic rules about at what point pregnant teachers would be forced to take their maternity leave. The Cleveland School Board required that pregnant teachers take unpaid leave five months before the expected childbirth and would not be permitted to return until the semester after the child reached the age of three months. Another school board noted in the case, in Chesterfield County, Virginia, required teachers to take unpaid leave four months and to give notice six months before the birth and would not be eligible for the next school year after the first day of school. The Court recognized that each pregnant teacher’s case is different and that many are able to continue working through the end of the pregnancy, making these imposed rules by the school boards violations of the pregnant teachers’ guarantee of due process.

Many of the employment discrimination cases have to do with sexual discrimination. In 1986, the case of Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson found that a claim of a “hostile environment” can be considered a form of sexual discrimination. The Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Serv., Inc. case in 1987 found that same-sex harassment can be considered a form of sexual harassment as covered by Title VII. In 1988, the case of Faragher v. City of Boca Raton found that an employer may be found liable for sexual discrimination caused by a supervisor, but liability will be dependant on the reasonableness of both the employers and the employee’s conduct.



Other Pa Employment Discrimination State Enforcement Agency related Articles

Discrimination Employment
Summary On Age Discrimination In Employment Act
Age Discrimination In Employment Act Of 1967
Employment Discrimination Cases
The Age Discrimination In Employment Act Of 1967

Do you want to contribute to our site : submit your articles HERE


 

Pa Employment Discrimination State Enforcement Agency News

NJ should ban arrests from job applications - The Star-Ledger - NJ.com (blog)


The Star-Ledger - NJ.com (blog)

NJ should ban arrests from job applications
The Star-Ledger - NJ.com (blog)
This groundbreaking guidance marks the first time the EEOC — the federal agency charged with interpreting and enforcing federal employment discrimination law — has said certain uses of criminal history is discrimination. Without question, this is a ...

and more »

Read more...


Judge dismisses part of Port Authority discrimination claim - New York Daily News


New York Daily News

Judge dismisses part of Port Authority discrimination claim
New York Daily News
A MANHATTAN federal judge partially dismissed a discrimination claim against the Port Authority on Thursday. The lawsuit, filed by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, accused the authority of paying male attorneys more than female ones and ...

and more »

Read more...


Mike McQueary sues Penn State for violation of the Whistleblower Act - Yahoo! Sports (blog)


Yahoo! Sports (blog)

Mike McQueary sues Penn State for violation of the Whistleblower Act
Yahoo! Sports (blog)
Even though he has yet to be fired, McQueary is entitled as a state employee under Pennsylvania law to find protection under the codified "Whistleblower Act." The motion is based on the law prohibiting retaliation for an employee reporting an illegal ...

and more »

Read more...


Federal and State Protections May Help Stop Senior Discrimination - DigitalJournal.com (press release)


Federal and State Protections May Help Stop Senior Discrimination
DigitalJournal.com (press release)
Instead of having a relatively sedentary job like the one that she had counted on, when she came back, she was told to move 200 loads of merchandise without any assistance. Ms. Squatrito felt discriminated against, but her plight -- as reported on by ...

Read more...


EEOC Issues New Criminal Background Check Guidelines for Employers - Law.com


Fox News

EEOC Issues New Criminal Background Check Guidelines for Employers
Law.com
By Jenna GreeneContactAll Articles The US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission issued new guidelines for employers on the use of criminal background checks when hiring new employees April 25, but lawyers who follow the agency closely do not ...
EEOC Offers Guidance...and Warnings to Employers Using Criminal Records to ...Blue MauMau

all 511 news articles »

Read more...