Employment Job Discrimination Information Guide

Employment Equality Sex Discrimination Relations Section


 

Employment Equality Sex Discrimination RelationsNavigation


|

Employment Network Plus Home Page
Partners
Tell A Friend about us
Employment Discrimination Laws |
Racial Discrimination Employment |
Employment Discrimination Cases |
Age Discrimination In Employment |
Summary On Age Discrimination In Employment Act |
Age Discrimination In Employment Act Of 1967 |
Landmark Cases On Racial Discrimination In Employment |
Employment Discrimination |
Employment Discrimination Law Part 2 |
Plaintiff Pro Se Won Verdict Employment Discrimination |
Discrimination Employment |
Employment Discrimination Laws |
Employment Discrimination On The Basis Of Sexual Orientation |
Discrimination Employment |
Gender Employment Discrimination |

List of employment discrimination Articles

Employment Equality Sex Discrimination Relations Best seller

Buy it Now!



Sitemap



Social bookmarking
You like it? Share it!
socialize it

Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter AND receive our exclusive Special Report on employment discrimination
Email:
First Name:



Main Employment Equality Sex Discrimination Relations sponsors


 

 

Welcome to Employment Job Discrimination Information Guide

 

Employment Equality Sex Discrimination Relations Article

Thumbnail example. For a permanent link to this article, or to bookmark it for further reading, click here.


You may also listen to this article by using the following controls.

How Effective are Employment Discrimination Laws?

from:


In 1963, a first and vital step toward establishing employment discrimination laws took effect in the form of the EPA. The EPA is the Equal Pay Act of 1963 that sought to rectify the gaping wage differences between working adult women and men. Today, there has been some improvement, but women still see only 77 cents to every dollar that the average American male earns.

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 added to the arsenal of employment discrimination laws as an effort to prevent hiring on the basis on race, gender, religious affiliation, or national heritage. These fall under “protected categories” and if violated, the employer can face severe monetary penalties and class-action lawsuits.

The American with Disabilities act was an added entree to the employment discrimination laws platter, providing protection for those with disabilities from receiving harassment or discrimination.

Employment discrimination laws are meant to prevent disparate treatment among employees and prospective hires. The Civil Rights Act of 1991 intended to further fortify the original Title VII amendment by eliminating the claim of “business necessity” in intentional discrimination acts, clarified disparate acts, and provided for damages to those who suffered employment discrimination on the basis of race, gender, national heritage, and disabilities.

Proponents of Affirmative Action advocate that this practice enables a more diverse and equitable workforce. In some countries, however, affirmative action is illegal as it serves to highlight racial backgrounds and thus promote more racism. Opponents in this country argue that affirmative action only adds to invidious hiring practices, impose limits on the freedom of choice, and sets up racial groups against one another. Richard Epstein elucidates this contention in his book Forbidden Grounds.

Family and medical leave is also protected under employment discrimination laws, and one case shows that an employer’s irreverence toward this law costs some big bucks. When a former broker for Merrill Lynch filed suit against the agency for wrongful termination, Merrill Lynch set out to make a settlement agreement. The broker was terminated while on leave, and could very well have garnered a six to seven figure reward for this kind of employment discrimination.

But the inequality is equally expressed when it comes time for paternal leave. The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 mandates that employers provide 12 weeks of unpaid leave for employees who must take care of children or sick family members, but often this extension applies more readily to female workers than men. Another case of discrimination arises in these cases when it appears evident that social expectations cater to women leaving work to care for children, but scoffs at male workers who petition for paternal leave.

Heavy fines ensue for employers, who disobey employment discrimination laws, but the fact alone remains that as long as these acts are necessary, our society has a long way to go to eradicate discrimination. In some cases, it may actually promote it. Only time will tell how well we achieve equilibrium and equality in employment trends.


Other Employment Equality Sex Discrimination Relations related Articles

Employment Discrimination
Discrimination Employment
Employment Discrimination Cases
Employment Discrimination On The Basis Of Sexual Orientation
Employment Discrimination Law Part 2

Do you want to contribute to our site : submit your articles HERE


 

Employment Equality Sex Discrimination Relations News

Virginia sets back equality

CHAD GRIFFIN Despite bipartisan support, the Virginia legislature failed to muster a sufficient majority to confirm a prosecutor nominated to a district judgeship in Richmond. Reason: The prosecutor is gay. Discrimination lives and don't let a Republican who supports such as this tell you they believe in freedom. The headline seemed worth noting in context of the fight of notable Arkansans to ...

Read more...


City in Kansas votes to outlaw discrimination against gays amid push to exempt churches

A Kansas town is divided over a law that would bar organizations including churches from discriminating against same-sex couples, with backers saying gays deserve the protection and critics complaining it's a case of government going too far.

Read more...


Senate Democrats Leap Into the Debate Over Gay Rights

After President Barack Obama's announcement that he supports same-sex marriage, several Senate Democrats have begun urging action on other gay rights issues.

Read more...


Bill banning sexual identification job discriminati by state rejected by Senate panel

BATON ROUGE -- A Senate committee Thursday dealt a major blow to a bill that would have banned discrimination in state employment based on sexual orientation, gender identification and gender expression. Senate Bill 100 was rejected 4-1 by the Committee...

Read more...


City: Gays get limited anti-bias protection

In what proved to be a surprise to both proponents and opponents of gay rights, the Hutchinson City ...

Read more...