Welcome to Employment Job Discrimination Information Guide
Employment Discrimination Law Article
. For a permanent link to this article, or to bookmark it for further reading, click here.
You may also listen to this article by using the following controls.
Landmark Cases On Racial Discrimination In Employment Have Impacted The U.S. Workforce
from:Despite the technological advancements and progress in social awareness that this country has made, we still have a long way to go in establishing equality among all races, classes, and genders. Discrimination and prejudice stems from eons of cultural ideology in which one nationality or race deems themselves better than another. This is still alive in many facets of our daily lives, and sadly, one of those is in the realm of a necessity to a fruitful life: employment.
Landmark cases on racial discrimination in employment have catapulted our citizens into a state of heightened awareness. The traditional patriarchal view that in some ways recognize white men as the leaders in industry and economy (as well as intellect and ability) is thankfully dwindling due to some brave individuals who fought for the right to equal value and opportunities.
One such example of a landmark case on racial discrimination in employment is that of a group of former Walgreens employees versus their former employer. The US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission found that Walgreens employers had been assigning African Americans to lower performing stores in African American neighborhoods. Further violating Title VII of the Civil Rights Code, Walgreens denied promotions to non-white workers. The ensuing lawsuit against Walgreens resulted in a $20 million settlement.
These landmark cases on racial discrimination in employment can provide an insight into our social paradigms and help to swing the pendulum into a blind society where skin color and dimensions are not used as guidelines for employment or abilities.
In April of 2005, Judge Susan Illston of the US District Court for the Northern District of California deemed Abercrombie and Fitch guilty in racial discrimination against employees. The approved settlement stipulated that the retail chain pay out $40 million in damages to the claimants. As of now, Abercrombie and Fitch are under a consent decree to set benchmarks for hiring those of African American, Latino, or Asian decent as well as women.
The positive repercussions of this landmark case on racial discrimination in employment may indeed spur a more diverse employee base in one of North America’s largest chain clothing stores. But this attention may also only serve to propagate the racial judgments that got them in this predicament in the first place.
Affirmative Action is a byproduct of these landmark cases on racial discrimination in employment. Some revel in the apparent equality that this measure summons, but others lament the requirement to hire on the basis of race and gender as they feel it presents a more invidious hiring approach and deepens resentment between racial groups.
Either way, it seems these landmark cases on racial discrimination in employment are deepening our awareness of workplace diversity as well as the legal implications of who hires whom.
Employment Discrimination Law News
A Transition in the Law - Business West
 Human Resources Journal | A Transition in the Law Business West Federal courts are increasingly finding that laws prohibiting gender discrimination apply to transgender individuals. And recently, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the administrative agency responsible for enforcing Title VII (which ... May issue bonus: Retail Security background checks Guardsmark Settles Harassment Suit with EEOC Ruling that Protects Transgender Workers Goes into Effect Today |
How Much Can Potential Employers Ask About You? - NPR
How Much Can Potential Employers Ask About You? NPR "The fact of the matter is that there aren't tremendous privacy protections for job applicants and employees in this country," says Judy Conti, who lobbies for the National Employment Law Center, an advocacy group for low-income and unemployed workers. |
Beecroft plan will boost discrimination, but not productivity - The Guardian
 The Guardian | Beecroft plan will boost discrimination, but not productivity The Guardian (The J, D and I stand for Just Do It.) The Beecroft proposals on removing employment protection with the aim of boosting the economy are the Whitehall equivalent of a JFDI order. Really, all this nonsense about fair play, decency and dignity is just so ... Some further refinements to the Beecroft proposals are needed. Analysis: How Adrian Beecroft proposed to rip up decades of employee rights to ... Plans to allow small firms to hire and fire workers more easily face axe |
Lauren Odes, Lingerie Company Employee, Fired For Being Too Hot, Files Sexual ... - The Hollywood Gossip
 First Coast News | Lauren Odes, Lingerie Company Employee, Fired For Being Too Hot, Files Sexual ... The Hollywood Gossip A New Jersey woman says she was fired from her job after her manager told her to "tape her breasts" down, and now has filed suit against the company. Claiming religious and sexual discrimination, former data entry worker Lauren Odes said that after two ... Too hot to work at a lingerie shop? Fired for being "too hot" Employee 'too hot' for lingerie warehouse |
Federal judge dismisses age and sex discrimination suit against Port Authority - The Star-Ledger - NJ.com
 The Star-Ledger - NJ.com | Federal judge dismisses age and sex discrimination suit against Port Authority The Star-Ledger - NJ.com Having the same job title and qualifications does not necessarily merit equal pay, a federal judge ruled in dismissing an age and sex discrimination suit against the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey. The suit was filed in October 2010 by the ... Judge dismisses Port Authority gender discrimination suit Judge tosses Port Authority pay disparity suit US Judge Dismisses Pay Disparity Lawsuit Against Port Authority |