Employment Job Discrimination Information Guide

Employment Discrimination Against Men Statistics Section


 

Employment Discrimination Against Men StatisticsNavigation


|

Employment Network Plus Home Page
Partners
Tell A Friend about us
What Is Employment Discrimination |
Employment And Discrimination |
Employment Discrimination Law Part 2 |
Employment Discrimination Cases |
Landmark Cases On Racial Discrimination In Employment |
Employment Discrimination |
Employment Discrimination Law Part 2 |
Age Discrimination In Employment |
Summary On Age Discrimination In Employment Act |
Landmark Cases On Racial Discrimination In Employment |
Plaintiff Pro Se Won Verdict Employment Discrimination |
Racial Discrimination Employment |
Racial Discrimination Employment |
Age Discrimination In Employment Act Of 1967 |
Plaintiff Pro Se Won Verdict Employment Discrimination |

List of employment discrimination Articles

Employment Discrimination Against Men Statistics Best seller

Buy it Now!



Sitemap



Social bookmarking
You like it? Share it!
socialize it

Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter AND receive our exclusive Special Report on employment discrimination
Email:
First Name:



Main Employment Discrimination Against Men Statistics sponsors


 

 

Welcome to Employment Job Discrimination Information Guide

 

Employment Discrimination Against Men Statistics Article

Thumbnail example. For a permanent link to this article, or to bookmark it for further reading, click here.


You may also listen to this article by using the following controls.

Employment Discrimination Cases That Have Helped Shape Today’s Laws

from:


Employment discrimination is an issue that touches many Americans. The landmark Civil Rights Act of 1964 did away with segregation and ensured working rights for African Americans and included the famous Title VII which prohibits employers to discriminate based on race, sex, religion or national origin. Since that time, a number of employment discrimination cases have made their way to the Supreme Court and have effectively changed how employment discrimination law is practiced today. In this article, we’ll take a look at a few of the employment discrimination cases that were judged by the Supreme Court and have shaped the law as we know it today.

The first of the employment discrimination cases of note, Griggs v. Duke Power Company, dates from 1971 and was an important victory for African Americans. The Court decided that it is unlawful to expect that certain educational requirements be met or to administer intelligence tests that are not related to the job to be filled. In many cases, these requirements or intelligence tests were an underhanded way to exclude African Americans from being considered for employment.

The next of the important employment discrimination cases was an important victory for pregnant teachers – 1974’s Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleur. At that time, public school boards had what would be considered archaic rules about at what point pregnant teachers would be forced to take their maternity leave. The Cleveland School Board required that pregnant teachers take unpaid leave five months before the expected childbirth and would not be permitted to return until the semester after the child reached the age of three months. Another school board noted in the case, in Chesterfield County, Virginia, required teachers to take unpaid leave four months and to give notice six months before the birth and would not be eligible for the next school year after the first day of school. The Court recognized that each pregnant teacher’s case is different and that many are able to continue working through the end of the pregnancy, making these imposed rules by the school boards violations of the pregnant teachers’ guarantee of due process.

Many of the employment discrimination cases have to do with sexual discrimination. In 1986, the case of Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson found that a claim of a “hostile environment” can be considered a form of sexual discrimination. The Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Serv., Inc. case in 1987 found that same-sex harassment can be considered a form of sexual harassment as covered by Title VII. In 1988, the case of Faragher v. City of Boca Raton found that an employer may be found liable for sexual discrimination caused by a supervisor, but liability will be dependant on the reasonableness of both the employers and the employee’s conduct.



Other Employment Discrimination Against Men Statistics related Articles

Racial Discrimination Employment
Employment Discrimination
What Is Employment Discrimination
Employment And Discrimination
Employment Discrimination Laws

Do you want to contribute to our site : submit your articles HERE


 

Employment Discrimination Against Men Statistics News

Texas Led Nation In Workplace Discrimination Complaints In 2011, EEOC Report Says

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission received more complaints of workplace discrimination from workers in Texas than from any other state last year, with 10 percent of all complaints filed there, according to a report made public by the agency on Monday.

Read more...


Europe 'biased against Muslims'

A report by human rights group Amnesty International says Muslims face discrimination in Europe if they openly demonstrate their faith.

Read more...


In Indiana, domestic violence can pose dilemma for employers

Worker was fired after she told boss she'd gotten a restraining order

Read more...


Muslims in Europe dogged by bias, Amnesty says

Muslims in Europe face discrimination in education, employment and religious freedom, an Amnesty International report said.

Read more...


New guidelines could alter employee background checks

New guidelines could alter employee background checks By SAM HANANEL The Associated Press Published Apr 28, 2012 05:22PM MDT Washington • Is an arrest in a barroom brawl 20 years ago a job disqualifier? Not necessarily, the government says in new guidelines on how employers can avoid running afoul of laws prohibiting job discrimination. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) said ...

Read more...